[thedream]

Autor greg SE

a treba biti posten i reci da je cijena trenutno vise nego ok jer konkurencija (gtx260 c216) je ipak barem 30% skuplja. I ako netko danas uzima grafu za igranje na 1680x1050 ili nizim rezama vjerovatno je best buy.
E sad, zasto bi netko s 8800gts 512mb se tako zaletio na to...e to je vec meni nedokucivo . Jer imao sam gtx+ (dakle isti k, mozda koji % jace zbog frekvencija) i ne sjecam se da nisam mogao igrati nesto sto bi mi omogucila gtx260.

Imao sam i ja Asusovu GTS 512mb,vrhunska kartica,prešao sam na ovu svoju iz dosade.

A razlika SRV,između 4850 i 4870 je 20%. Razlika pak između 4870 sa 512 i 1gb je 5-7%. Malo si krivo postavio stvari,previše stvari tako uspoređujući.

GTX260 je brža od obje,u prosjeku 5-10% od 4870 1gb.Ovisi zaista o naslovima,u GRIDU kako sam kažeš,je pušing nvidia,dok u company of heroes OF :

What's interesting to note is that there's a 32 per cent performance gain over the Radeon HD 4870 1GB when looking at the 1,920x1,200 results, and between 50fps to 66fps that becomes significant.

http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=16508&page=6

http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=16508&page=8

Zanimljivo,clockana GTX260 216 :

Cranking it up some more from the base 576MHz/1,242/1,998MHz clocks, we managed really push the card to decent levels, topping out at 704MHz core/1,414MHz shaders/2,450MHz memory. Seeing this, we wonder if the same base binning is used on EXO samples, too.

Looking back at the ET:QW test at 1,920x1,200 we see that card, at its shipping clocks, scored an average 75.93fps. When overclocked this rose to an impressive 89.7 fps when overclocked, which is the kind of benchmark result a Radeon HD 4850 X2 returns.