02.02.2009., 21:58
|
#13
|
|
-------
Datum registracije: Aug 2005
Lokacija: -
Postovi: 7,568
|
Citiraj:
Autor Pomo
Pa ispravka bi bila u tome da ipak stare video vrpce (ne VHS nego one za kino) imaju daleko veću rezoluciju od današnjeg HD-a, tako da donekle i ima smisla. Mislim da je ovakav info netko postao na forumu (Visage mejbi), nije moj info...
|
Citiraj:
Autor morph
Evo konkstruktivan prijedlog: 1, 2
Odgovor nadjen u cca 120 sekundi:
Citiraj:
The very short answer is that there are around 20 million "quality" pixels in a top-quality 35mm shot.
What this means is that a 5300 x 4000 digital camera would produce a shot equivalent to a scan from a quality 35mm camera
How many pixels in a frame of 35mm film?
A 1920x1080 HD signal is only 2 million.
Should be able to salvage enough resolution on old film to make a decent picture.
Q: I just bought a Blu-ray player and am a big fan of old films. Is it possible for older movies that were shot before high-definition existed to really be HD?
A: There’s no reason movies shot on 35-mm film can’t look great in HD; their native resolution is actually far higher than Blu-ray’s. (Remember: These movies were shot to fill huge theater screens.) And when films are scanned into digital, they are brought in at between 2000 and 8000 lines of horizontal resolution—far more than Blu-ray’s 1920 pixels across by 1080 pixels down.
|
|
|
|
|