View Single Post
Staro 01.10.2002., 02:20   #16
greg SE
Premium
Moj komp
 
greg SE's Avatar
 
Datum registracije: Oct 2001
Lokacija: Vinkovci
Postovi: 5,231
Citiraj:
Originally posted by igx
pa izleda da mi nismo citali iste testove te kartice ili sam ja nesto gadno zabrijao! za sada znam da je 8500 jaci u gotovo svemu, ali 9000 ima neke stvari koje bi se trebale iskoristiti tek u novim igrama. tak sam procitao, a sad kome je za vjerovati...!!?? uzeo bi i ja 8500 ali tesko ga je nabaviti (barem kvalitetnog), jer ti zaostaci sta sad jos dolaze na trzista, tko zna sta je to! vjerojatno cu potraziti 9000 pro sa 128mb, znam gdje ih je bilo po 1150kn od powercolora samo sta radi na 275/250 (vjerojatno 4ns ramovi)
evo s tomshardware:

During video playback, the pixel shaders remain in 2D mode anyway, so they are available for this purpose. In addition, there are completely new realtime filtering capabilities available that, for example, prevent pixelation in low-resolution videos or allow special optimizations for specific video codecs such as DivX.

i ovdje:
http://www.tech-report.com/reviews/2...o/index.x?pg=2

ATI says over 70% of the CPU load of video decoding is related to de-blocking. If so, it makes a lot of sense to offload that work to the GPU. The de-blocking possible on the RV250 actually looks quite good. It has the potential to make some lower quality video at least bearable to watch. Incidentally, the R9000 Pro's video de-blocking should be able to work with any block-based encoding format, including DivX.

e sad sta sam ja krivo u proslom postu napisao???
nisi napisao nista krivo ali.........
to o cemu oni pricaju je vezano za ultra nekvalitetne filmove koji ce izgledati malo bolje s tim...........
s normalni divxima neces ni primjetiti razliku
greg SE je offline   Reply With Quote